How Did My Home Pass Inspection?
It’s a little after seven o’clock in the evening as community managers, board members, and homeowners squeeze into a crowded conference room. They’ve all come to hear a panel of experts address a growing issue affecting all of us – construction defects. One of the homeowners asks, “How do I have construction deficiencies when my home passed the county inspection?” and another, “Who is responsible?” As attorneys with over 30 years of experience handling construction defect matters, we often hear these same two questions.
The answer to the first question requires an understanding of the three-step building process:
(1) plan check, (2) building permits, and (3) inspections.
Plan Check
Before a site may be approved for construction, the builder must provide the building department with a copy of the proposed plans and specifications for approval. The city or county of engineers may either approve the plans as written, or request changes to bring the plans into compliance with the city or county standards. Although the project makes it through plan check, the city or county is not liable for any defects in the plans. City and county engineers do not have the time or resources to make the detailed investigation which would be required to ensure that the plans comply with every code and standard. They cannot and do not guarantee that the plans are fully compliant.
Building Permit
Once the plans are approved, the permits are issued to give the builder permission to build according to the approved plan.
Inspections
After the construction begins, the city or county performs inspections at certain phases in the building process. For example, inspections might occur when the framing is complete or when the rough electrical work has been completed. Although many homeowners believe that city or county inspections ensure that the home was built according to the plans, specifications and minimum building requirements, this is not the case. In a lawsuit our firm brought to trial, the chief building official testified that the city cannot be the guarantor of good construction. The building official testified that because inspectors only observe an extremely small part of the construction process, they are not able to prevent many construction defects.
Because the municipal engineers and inspectors are not able to ensure complete compliance with building codes, most jurisdictions give the governmental entities complete immunity from legal liability for construction defects. If the government is not responsible for the defects in your home, the questions remains, “Who is responsible?” The answer can be complex. There are many players in the design and construction of a new home. Sorting out who is responsible requires painstaking research and a detailed knowledge of the applicable laws and codes in your jurisdiction. As disheartening as construction defects can be, with proper expertise on your side, those responsible for the defects can be held accountable. If you suspect defects in the construction of your home, be sure to contact an attorney with the proper qualifications and experience.
If you think you have potential construction defects, contact Burdman Law Group for a free, no obligation inspection with a licensed contractor.
Tel. 888-350-9080
Burdman Law Group
This material is for informational purposes only, and is not legal advice. For specific legal advice concerning a particular fact situation, please consult an attorney.
What draws my attention to using digital tools in vocational learning is the possibility of making an unfamiliar subject feel closer to everyday life. Digital resources are most useful when they help students practise a recognisable workplace task. It also gives the phrase digital vocational education a clearer meaning than a label on its own. I am still thinking through the details, and a small example would help me picture how this works in practice. Which activities benefit from an online tool and which still need hands-on practice?
Considering making online counselling easier to approach, I keep coming back to the difference between knowing about an idea and putting it into practice. Knowing how a first conversation works can reduce uncertainty about asking for support. It gives me a more concrete starting point for thinking about online counselling information. A short discussion of an everyday example would make this easier for me to connect with, especially as someone still learning about the subject. What practical information should be available before someone books an online session?
Thinking about applying business training to everyday work, I find the smaller practical questions more interesting than a quick conclusion. A useful training exercise should connect a new idea with a situation people actually encounter. That is the kind of detail I would keep in mind while exploring practical business training. I do not have a settled view yet, but this seems like a good place to slow down and look more closely. How would you check whether a workshop changes behaviour after it ends?
I can see why making personal safety education age appropriate would invite discussion, since different people will bring different experiences to the same question. Clear language about boundaries makes an awkward subject easier to discuss respectfully. It also gives the phrase personal safety education a clearer meaning than a label on its own. I am more curious about the process than a polished result, because the steps in between are usually where questions appear. How can lessons about personal safety remain understandable at different ages?
The subject of learning through imaginative preschool play feels more interesting when there is room for a reader to stop and ask their own questions. Inventing a story together gives children room to experiment with language and ideas. It gives me a more concrete starting point for thinking about imaginative preschool play. I can imagine different answers depending on the situation, so I would want to understand the context before drawing conclusions. How can adults support imaginative play without deciding every detail?